| skiboot-5.1.3 |
| ------------- |
| |
| skiboot-5.1.3 was released on September 15th, 2015. |
| |
| skiboot-5.1.3 is the 4th stable release of 5.1, it follows skiboot-5.1.2 |
| (which was released September 9th, 2015). |
| |
| Skiboot 5.1.3 contains all fixes from skiboot-5.1.2 and is a minor bugfix |
| release. |
| |
| Changes |
| ^^^^^^^ |
| Over skiboot-5.1.2, we have the following changes: |
| |
| - slot names for firestone platform |
| - fix display of LPC errors |
| - SBE based timer support |
| |
| - on supported platforms limits reliance on Linux heartbeat |
| - fix use-after-free in fsp/ipmi |
| - fix hang on TOD/TB errors (time-of-day/timebase) on OpenPower systems |
| |
| - On getting a Hypervizor Maintenance Interrupt to get the timebase |
| back into a running state, we would call prlog which would use |
| the LPC UART console driver on OpenPower systems, which depends on |
| a working timebase, leading to a hang. |
| We now don't depend on a working timebase in this recovery codepath. |
| - enable prd for garrison platform |
| - PCI: Clear error bits after changing MPS |
| Chaning MPS on PCI upstream bridge might cause error bits set on |
| downstream endpoints when system boots into Linux as below case |
| shows: :: |
| |
| host# lspci -vvs 0001:06:00.0 |
| 0001:06:00.0 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation \ |
| NetXtreme II BCM57810 10 Gigabit Ethernet (rev 10) |
| DevSta: CorrErr+ UncorrErr- FatalErr- UnsuppReq+ AuxPwr- TransPend- |
| CESta: RxErr- BadTLP- BadDLLP- Rollover- Timeout- NonFatalErr+ |
| |
| This clears those error bits in AER and PCIe capability after MPS |
| is changed. With the patch applied, no more error bits are seen. |
| |
| Contributors |
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^ |
| Processed 14 csets from 6 developers |
| 1 employers found |
| A total of 462 lines added, 163 removed (delta 299) |
| |
| Developers with the most changesets |
| |
| ============================ ========= |
| ============================ ========= |
| Benjamin Herrenschmidt 5 (35.7%) |
| Stewart Smith 4 (28.6%) |
| Mahesh Salgaonkar 2 (14.3%) |
| Gavin Shan 1 (7.1%) |
| Jeremy Kerr 1 (7.1%) |
| Neelesh Gupta 1 (7.1%) |
| ============================ ========= |
| |
| Developers with the most changed lines |
| |
| ========================== =========== |
| ========================== =========== |
| Benjamin Herrenschmidt 407 (80.8%) |
| Mahesh Salgaonkar 23 (4.6%) |
| Gavin Shan 19 (3.8%) |
| Stewart Smith 18 (3.6%) |
| Jeremy Kerr 5 (1.0%) |
| Neelesh Gupta 2 (0.4%) |
| ========================== =========== |
| |
| Developers with the most lines removed |
| |
| ========================== =========== |
| ========================== =========== |
| Stewart Smith 8 (4.9%) |
| Jeremy Kerr 3 (1.8%) |
| Neelesh Gupta 1 (0.6%) |
| ========================== =========== |
| |
| Developers with the most signoffs (total 10) |
| |
| ========================== =========== |
| ========================== =========== |
| Stewart Smith 10 (100.0%) |
| ========================== =========== |
| |
| Developers with the most reviews (total 1) |
| |
| ========================== =========== |
| ========================== =========== |
| Joel Stanley 1 (100.0%) |
| ========================== =========== |
| |
| Developers with the most test credits (total 0) |
| |
| Developers who gave the most tested-by credits (total 0) |
| |
| Developers with the most report credits (total 1) |
| |
| ========================== =========== |
| ========================== =========== |
| John Walthour 1 (100.0%) |
| ========================== =========== |
| |
| Developers who gave the most report credits (total 1) |
| |
| ========================== =========== |
| ========================== =========== |
| Gavin Shan 1 (100.0%) |
| ========================== =========== |
| |
| Top changeset contributors by employer |
| |
| ========================== =========== |
| ========================== =========== |
| IBM 14 (100.0%) |
| ========================== =========== |
| |
| Top lines changed by employer |
| |
| ========================== =========== |
| ========================== =========== |
| IBM 504 (100.0%) |
| ========================== =========== |
| |
| Employers with the most signoffs (total 10) |
| |
| ========================== =========== |
| ========================== =========== |
| IBM 10 (100.0%) |
| ========================== =========== |
| |
| Employers with the most hackers (total 6) |
| |
| ========================== =========== |
| ========================== =========== |
| IBM 6 (100.0%) |
| ========================== =========== |
