| Definition of terms |
| =================== |
| |
| This section defines the terms used in this document and correlates them with |
| what is currently used on QEMU. |
| |
| Automated tests |
| --------------- |
| |
| An automated test is written on a test framework using its generic test |
| functions/classes. The test framework can run the tests and report their |
| success or failure [1]_. |
| |
| An automated test has essentially three parts: |
| |
| 1. The test initialization of the parameters, where the expected parameters, |
| like inputs and expected results, are set up; |
| 2. The call to the code that should be tested; |
| 3. An assertion, comparing the result from the previous call with the expected |
| result set during the initialization of the parameters. If the result |
| matches the expected result, the test has been successful; otherwise, it has |
| failed. |
| |
| Unit testing |
| ------------ |
| |
| A unit test is responsible for exercising individual software components as a |
| unit, like interfaces, data structures, and functionality, uncovering errors |
| within the boundaries of a component. The verification effort is in the |
| smallest software unit and focuses on the internal processing logic and data |
| structures. A test case of unit tests should be designed to uncover errors due |
| to erroneous computations, incorrect comparisons, or improper control flow [2]_. |
| |
| On QEMU, unit testing is represented by the 'check-unit' target from 'make'. |
| |
| Functional testing |
| ------------------ |
| |
| A functional test focuses on the functional requirement of the software. |
| Deriving sets of input conditions, the functional tests should fully exercise |
| all the functional requirements for a program. Functional testing is |
| complementary to other testing techniques, attempting to find errors like |
| incorrect or missing functions, interface errors, behavior errors, and |
| initialization and termination errors [3]_. |
| |
| On QEMU, functional testing is represented by the 'check-qtest' target from |
| 'make'. |
| |
| System testing |
| -------------- |
| |
| System tests ensure all application elements mesh properly while the overall |
| functionality and performance are achieved [4]_. Some or all system components |
| are integrated to create a complete system to be tested as a whole. System |
| testing ensures that components are compatible, interact correctly, and |
| transfer the right data at the right time across their interfaces. As system |
| testing focuses on interactions, use case-based testing is a practical approach |
| to system testing [5]_. Note that, in some cases, system testing may require |
| interaction with third-party software, like operating system images, databases, |
| networks, and so on. |
| |
| On QEMU, system testing is represented by the 'check-acceptance' target from |
| 'make'. |
| |
| Flaky tests |
| ----------- |
| |
| A flaky test is defined as a test that exhibits both a passing and a failing |
| result with the same code on different runs. Some usual reasons for an |
| intermittent/flaky test are async wait, concurrency, and test order dependency |
| [6]_. |
| |
| Gating |
| ------ |
| |
| A gate restricts the move of code from one stage to another on a |
| test/deployment pipeline. The step move is granted with approval. The approval |
| can be a manual intervention or a set of tests succeeding [7]_. |
| |
| On QEMU, the gating process happens during the pull request. The approval is |
| done by the project leader running its own set of tests. The pull request gets |
| merged when the tests succeed. |
| |
| Continuous Integration (CI) |
| --------------------------- |
| |
| Continuous integration (CI) requires the builds of the entire application and |
| the execution of a comprehensive set of automated tests every time there is a |
| need to commit any set of changes [8]_. The automated tests can be composed of |
| the unit, functional, system, and other tests. |
| |
| Keynotes about continuous integration (CI) [9]_: |
| |
| 1. System tests may depend on external software (operating system images, |
| firmware, database, network). |
| 2. It may take a long time to build and test. It may be impractical to build |
| the system being developed several times per day. |
| 3. If the development platform is different from the target platform, it may |
| not be possible to run system tests in the developer’s private workspace. |
| There may be differences in hardware, operating system, or installed |
| software. Therefore, more time is required for testing the system. |
| |
| References |
| ---------- |
| |
| .. [1] Sommerville, Ian (2016). Software Engineering. p. 233. |
| .. [2] Pressman, Roger S. & Maxim, Bruce R. (2020). Software Engineering, |
| A Practitioner’s Approach. p. 48, 376, 378, 381. |
| .. [3] Pressman, Roger S. & Maxim, Bruce R. (2020). Software Engineering, |
| A Practitioner’s Approach. p. 388. |
| .. [4] Pressman, Roger S. & Maxim, Bruce R. (2020). Software Engineering, |
| A Practitioner’s Approach. Software Engineering, p. 377. |
| .. [5] Sommerville, Ian (2016). Software Engineering. p. 59, 232, 240. |
| .. [6] Luo, Qingzhou, et al. An empirical analysis of flaky tests. |
| Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on |
| Foundations of Software Engineering. 2014. |
| .. [7] Humble, Jez & Farley, David (2010). Continuous Delivery: |
| Reliable Software Releases Through Build, Test, and Deployment, p. 122. |
| .. [8] Humble, Jez & Farley, David (2010). Continuous Delivery: |
| Reliable Software Releases Through Build, Test, and Deployment, p. 55. |
| .. [9] Sommerville, Ian (2016). Software Engineering. p. 743. |