| Multi-process QEMU | |
| =================== | |
| .. note:: | |
| This is the design document for multi-process QEMU. It does not | |
| necessarily reflect the status of the current implementation, which | |
| may lack features or be considerably different from what is described | |
| in this document. This document is still useful as a description of | |
| the goals and general direction of this feature. | |
| Please refer to the following wiki for latest details: | |
| https://wiki.qemu.org/Features/MultiProcessQEMU | |
| QEMU is often used as the hypervisor for virtual machines running in the | |
| Oracle cloud. Since one of the advantages of cloud computing is the | |
| ability to run many VMs from different tenants in the same cloud | |
| infrastructure, a guest that compromised its hypervisor could | |
| potentially use the hypervisor's access privileges to access data it is | |
| not authorized for. | |
| QEMU can be susceptible to security attacks because it is a large, | |
| monolithic program that provides many features to the VMs it services. | |
| Many of these features can be configured out of QEMU, but even a reduced | |
| configuration QEMU has a large amount of code a guest can potentially | |
| attack. Separating QEMU reduces the attack surface by aiding to | |
| limit each component in the system to only access the resources that | |
| it needs to perform its job. | |
| QEMU services | |
| ------------- | |
| QEMU can be broadly described as providing three main services. One is a | |
| VM control point, where VMs can be created, migrated, re-configured, and | |
| destroyed. A second is to emulate the CPU instructions within the VM, | |
| often accelerated by HW virtualization features such as Intel's VT | |
| extensions. Finally, it provides IO services to the VM by emulating HW | |
| IO devices, such as disk and network devices. | |
| A multi-process QEMU | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
| A multi-process QEMU involves separating QEMU services into separate | |
| host processes. Each of these processes can be given only the privileges | |
| it needs to provide its service, e.g., a disk service could be given | |
| access only to the disk images it provides, and not be allowed to | |
| access other files, or any network devices. An attacker who compromised | |
| this service would not be able to use this exploit to access files or | |
| devices beyond what the disk service was given access to. | |
| A QEMU control process would remain, but in multi-process mode, will | |
| have no direct interfaces to the VM. During VM execution, it would still | |
| provide the user interface to hot-plug devices or live migrate the VM. | |
| A first step in creating a multi-process QEMU is to separate IO services | |
| from the main QEMU program, which would continue to provide CPU | |
| emulation. i.e., the control process would also be the CPU emulation | |
| process. In a later phase, CPU emulation could be separated from the | |
| control process. | |
| Separating IO services | |
| ---------------------- | |
| Separating IO services into individual host processes is a good place to | |
| begin for a couple of reasons. One is the sheer number of IO devices QEMU | |
| can emulate provides a large surface of interfaces which could potentially | |
| be exploited, and, indeed, have been a source of exploits in the past. | |
| Another is the modular nature of QEMU device emulation code provides | |
| interface points where the QEMU functions that perform device emulation | |
| can be separated from the QEMU functions that manage the emulation of | |
| guest CPU instructions. The devices emulated in the separate process are | |
| referred to as remote devices. | |
| QEMU device emulation | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
| QEMU uses an object oriented SW architecture for device emulation code. | |
| Configured objects are all compiled into the QEMU binary, then objects | |
| are instantiated by name when used by the guest VM. For example, the | |
| code to emulate a device named "foo" is always present in QEMU, but its | |
| instantiation code is only run when the device is included in the target | |
| VM. (e.g., via the QEMU command line as *-device foo*) | |
| The object model is hierarchical, so device emulation code names its | |
| parent object (such as "pci-device" for a PCI device) and QEMU will | |
| instantiate a parent object before calling the device's instantiation | |
| code. | |
| Current separation models | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
| In order to separate the device emulation code from the CPU emulation | |
| code, the device object code must run in a different process. There are | |
| a couple of existing QEMU features that can run emulation code | |
| separately from the main QEMU process. These are examined below. | |
| vhost user model | |
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ | |
| Virtio guest device drivers can be connected to vhost user applications | |
| in order to perform their IO operations. This model uses special virtio | |
| device drivers in the guest and vhost user device objects in QEMU, but | |
| once the QEMU vhost user code has configured the vhost user application, | |
| mission-mode IO is performed by the application. The vhost user | |
| application is a daemon process that can be contacted via a known UNIX | |
| domain socket. | |
| vhost socket | |
| '''''''''''' | |
| As mentioned above, one of the tasks of the vhost device object within | |
| QEMU is to contact the vhost application and send it configuration | |
| information about this device instance. As part of the configuration | |
| process, the application can also be sent other file descriptors over | |
| the socket, which then can be used by the vhost user application in | |
| various ways, some of which are described below. | |
| vhost MMIO store acceleration | |
| ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' | |
| VMs are often run using HW virtualization features via the KVM kernel | |
| driver. This driver allows QEMU to accelerate the emulation of guest CPU | |
| instructions by running the guest in a virtual HW mode. When the guest | |
| executes instructions that cannot be executed by virtual HW mode, | |
| execution returns to the KVM driver so it can inform QEMU to emulate the | |
| instructions in SW. | |
| One of the events that can cause a return to QEMU is when a guest device | |
| driver accesses an IO location. QEMU then dispatches the memory | |
| operation to the corresponding QEMU device object. In the case of a | |
| vhost user device, the memory operation would need to be sent over a | |
| socket to the vhost application. This path is accelerated by the QEMU | |
| virtio code by setting up an eventfd file descriptor that the vhost | |
| application can directly receive MMIO store notifications from the KVM | |
| driver, instead of needing them to be sent to the QEMU process first. | |
| vhost interrupt acceleration | |
| '''''''''''''''''''''''''''' | |
| Another optimization used by the vhost application is the ability to | |
| directly inject interrupts into the VM via the KVM driver, again, | |
| bypassing the need to send the interrupt back to the QEMU process first. | |
| The QEMU virtio setup code configures the KVM driver with an eventfd | |
| that triggers the device interrupt in the guest when the eventfd is | |
| written. This irqfd file descriptor is then passed to the vhost user | |
| application program. | |
| vhost access to guest memory | |
| '''''''''''''''''''''''''''' | |
| The vhost application is also allowed to directly access guest memory, | |
| instead of needing to send the data as messages to QEMU. This is also | |
| done with file descriptors sent to the vhost user application by QEMU. | |
| These descriptors can be passed to ``mmap()`` by the vhost application | |
| to map the guest address space into the vhost application. | |
| IOMMUs introduce another level of complexity, since the address given to | |
| the guest virtio device to DMA to or from is not a guest physical | |
| address. This case is handled by having vhost code within QEMU register | |
| as a listener for IOMMU mapping changes. The vhost application maintains | |
| a cache of IOMMMU translations: sending translation requests back to | |
| QEMU on cache misses, and in turn receiving flush requests from QEMU | |
| when mappings are purged. | |
| applicability to device separation | |
| '''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' | |
| Much of the vhost model can be re-used by separated device emulation. In | |
| particular, the ideas of using a socket between QEMU and the device | |
| emulation application, using a file descriptor to inject interrupts into | |
| the VM via KVM, and allowing the application to ``mmap()`` the guest | |
| should be re used. | |
| There are, however, some notable differences between how a vhost | |
| application works and the needs of separated device emulation. The most | |
| basic is that vhost uses custom virtio device drivers which always | |
| trigger IO with MMIO stores. A separated device emulation model must | |
| work with existing IO device models and guest device drivers. MMIO loads | |
| break vhost store acceleration since they are synchronous - guest | |
| progress cannot continue until the load has been emulated. By contrast, | |
| stores are asynchronous, the guest can continue after the store event | |
| has been sent to the vhost application. | |
| Another difference is that in the vhost user model, a single daemon can | |
| support multiple QEMU instances. This is contrary to the security regime | |
| desired, in which the emulation application should only be allowed to | |
| access the files or devices the VM it's running on behalf of can access. | |
| #### qemu-io model | |
| ``qemu-io`` is a test harness used to test changes to the QEMU block backend | |
| object code (e.g., the code that implements disk images for disk driver | |
| emulation). ``qemu-io`` is not a device emulation application per se, but it | |
| does compile the QEMU block objects into a separate binary from the main | |
| QEMU one. This could be useful for disk device emulation, since its | |
| emulation applications will need to include the QEMU block objects. | |
| New separation model based on proxy objects | |
| ------------------------------------------- | |
| A different model based on proxy objects in the QEMU program | |
| communicating with remote emulation programs could provide separation | |
| while minimizing the changes needed to the device emulation code. The | |
| rest of this section is a discussion of how a proxy object model would | |
| work. | |
| Remote emulation processes | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
| The remote emulation process will run the QEMU object hierarchy without | |
| modification. The device emulation objects will be also be based on the | |
| QEMU code, because for anything but the simplest device, it would not be | |
| a tractable to re-implement both the object model and the many device | |
| backends that QEMU has. | |
| The processes will communicate with the QEMU process over UNIX domain | |
| sockets. The processes can be executed either as standalone processes, | |
| or be executed by QEMU. In both cases, the host backends the emulation | |
| processes will provide are specified on its command line, as they would | |
| be for QEMU. For example: | |
| :: | |
| disk-proc -blockdev driver=file,node-name=file0,filename=disk-file0 \ | |
| -blockdev driver=qcow2,node-name=drive0,file=file0 | |
| would indicate process *disk-proc* uses a qcow2 emulated disk named | |
| *file0* as its backend. | |
| Emulation processes may emulate more than one guest controller. A common | |
| configuration might be to put all controllers of the same device class | |
| (e.g., disk, network, etc.) in a single process, so that all backends of | |
| the same type can be managed by a single QMP monitor. | |
| communication with QEMU | |
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ | |
| The first argument to the remote emulation process will be a Unix domain | |
| socket that connects with the Proxy object. This is a required argument. | |
| :: | |
| disk-proc <socket number> <backend list> | |
| remote process QMP monitor | |
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ | |
| Remote emulation processes can be monitored via QMP, similar to QEMU | |
| itself. The QMP monitor socket is specified the same as for a QEMU | |
| process: | |
| :: | |
| disk-proc -qmp unix:/tmp/disk-mon,server | |
| can be monitored over the UNIX socket path */tmp/disk-mon*. | |
| QEMU command line | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
| Each remote device emulated in a remote process on the host is | |
| represented as a *-device* of type *pci-proxy-dev*. A socket | |
| sub-option to this option specifies the Unix socket that connects | |
| to the remote process. An *id* sub-option is required, and it should | |
| be the same id as used in the remote process. | |
| :: | |
| qemu-system-x86_64 ... -device pci-proxy-dev,id=lsi0,socket=3 | |
| can be used to add a device emulated in a remote process | |
| QEMU management of remote processes | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
| QEMU is not aware of the type of type of the remote PCI device. It is | |
| a pass through device as far as QEMU is concerned. | |
| communication with emulation process | |
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ | |
| primary channel | |
| ''''''''''''''' | |
| The primary channel (referred to as com in the code) is used to bootstrap | |
| the remote process. It is also used to pass on device-agnostic commands | |
| like reset. | |
| per-device channels | |
| ''''''''''''''''''' | |
| Each remote device communicates with QEMU using a dedicated communication | |
| channel. The proxy object sets up this channel using the primary | |
| channel during its initialization. | |
| QEMU device proxy objects | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
| QEMU has an object model based on sub-classes inherited from the | |
| "object" super-class. The sub-classes that are of interest here are the | |
| "device" and "bus" sub-classes whose child sub-classes make up the | |
| device tree of a QEMU emulated system. | |
| The proxy object model will use device proxy objects to replace the | |
| device emulation code within the QEMU process. These objects will live | |
| in the same place in the object and bus hierarchies as the objects they | |
| replace. i.e., the proxy object for an LSI SCSI controller will be a | |
| sub-class of the "pci-device" class, and will have the same PCI bus | |
| parent and the same SCSI bus child objects as the LSI controller object | |
| it replaces. | |
| It is worth noting that the same proxy object is used to mediate with | |
| all types of remote PCI devices. | |
| object initialization | |
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ | |
| The Proxy device objects are initialized in the exact same manner in | |
| which any other QEMU device would be initialized. | |
| In addition, the Proxy objects perform the following two tasks: | |
| - Parses the "socket" sub option and connects to the remote process | |
| using this channel | |
| - Uses the "id" sub-option to connect to the emulated device on the | |
| separate process | |
| class\_init | |
| ''''''''''' | |
| The ``class_init()`` method of a proxy object will, in general behave | |
| similarly to the object it replaces, including setting any static | |
| properties and methods needed by the proxy. | |
| instance\_init / realize | |
| '''''''''''''''''''''''' | |
| The ``instance_init()`` and ``realize()`` functions would only need to | |
| perform tasks related to being a proxy, such are registering its own | |
| MMIO handlers, or creating a child bus that other proxy devices can be | |
| attached to later. | |
| Other tasks will be device-specific. For example, PCI device objects | |
| will initialize the PCI config space in order to make a valid PCI device | |
| tree within the QEMU process. | |
| address space registration | |
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ | |
| Most devices are driven by guest device driver accesses to IO addresses | |
| or ports. The QEMU device emulation code uses QEMU's memory region | |
| function calls (such as ``memory_region_init_io()``) to add callback | |
| functions that QEMU will invoke when the guest accesses the device's | |
| areas of the IO address space. When a guest driver does access the | |
| device, the VM will exit HW virtualization mode and return to QEMU, | |
| which will then lookup and execute the corresponding callback function. | |
| A proxy object would need to mirror the memory region calls the actual | |
| device emulator would perform in its initialization code, but with its | |
| own callbacks. When invoked by QEMU as a result of a guest IO operation, | |
| they will forward the operation to the device emulation process. | |
| PCI config space | |
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ | |
| PCI devices also have a configuration space that can be accessed by the | |
| guest driver. Guest accesses to this space is not handled by the device | |
| emulation object, but by its PCI parent object. Much of this space is | |
| read-only, but certain registers (especially BAR and MSI-related ones) | |
| need to be propagated to the emulation process. | |
| PCI parent proxy | |
| '''''''''''''''' | |
| One way to propagate guest PCI config accesses is to create a | |
| "pci-device-proxy" class that can serve as the parent of a PCI device | |
| proxy object. This class's parent would be "pci-device" and it would | |
| override the PCI parent's ``config_read()`` and ``config_write()`` | |
| methods with ones that forward these operations to the emulation | |
| program. | |
| interrupt receipt | |
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ | |
| A proxy for a device that generates interrupts will need to create a | |
| socket to receive interrupt indications from the emulation process. An | |
| incoming interrupt indication would then be sent up to its bus parent to | |
| be injected into the guest. For example, a PCI device object may use | |
| ``pci_set_irq()``. | |
| live migration | |
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ | |
| The proxy will register to save and restore any *vmstate* it needs over | |
| a live migration event. The device proxy does not need to manage the | |
| remote device's *vmstate*; that will be handled by the remote process | |
| proxy (see below). | |
| QEMU remote device operation | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
| Generic device operations, such as DMA, will be performed by the remote | |
| process proxy by sending messages to the remote process. | |
| DMA operations | |
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ | |
| DMA operations would be handled much like vhost applications do. One of | |
| the initial messages sent to the emulation process is a guest memory | |
| table. Each entry in this table consists of a file descriptor and size | |
| that the emulation process can ``mmap()`` to directly access guest | |
| memory, similar to ``vhost_user_set_mem_table()``. Note guest memory | |
| must be backed by file descriptors, such as when QEMU is given the | |
| *-mem-path* command line option. | |
| IOMMU operations | |
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ | |
| When the emulated system includes an IOMMU, the remote process proxy in | |
| QEMU will need to create a socket for IOMMU requests from the emulation | |
| process. It will handle those requests with an | |
| ``address_space_get_iotlb_entry()`` call. In order to handle IOMMU | |
| unmaps, the remote process proxy will also register as a listener on the | |
| device's DMA address space. When an IOMMU memory region is created | |
| within the DMA address space, an IOMMU notifier for unmaps will be added | |
| to the memory region that will forward unmaps to the emulation process | |
| over the IOMMU socket. | |
| device hot-plug via QMP | |
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ | |
| An QMP "device\_add" command can add a device emulated by a remote | |
| process. It will also have "rid" option to the command, just as the | |
| *-device* command line option does. The remote process may either be one | |
| started at QEMU startup, or be one added by the "add-process" QMP | |
| command described above. In either case, the remote process proxy will | |
| forward the new device's JSON description to the corresponding emulation | |
| process. | |
| live migration | |
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ | |
| The remote process proxy will also register for live migration | |
| notifications with ``vmstate_register()``. When called to save state, | |
| the proxy will send the remote process a secondary socket file | |
| descriptor to save the remote process's device *vmstate* over. The | |
| incoming byte stream length and data will be saved as the proxy's | |
| *vmstate*. When the proxy is resumed on its new host, this *vmstate* | |
| will be extracted, and a secondary socket file descriptor will be sent | |
| to the new remote process through which it receives the *vmstate* in | |
| order to restore the devices there. | |
| device emulation in remote process | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
| The parts of QEMU that the emulation program will need include the | |
| object model; the memory emulation objects; the device emulation objects | |
| of the targeted device, and any dependent devices; and, the device's | |
| backends. It will also need code to setup the machine environment, | |
| handle requests from the QEMU process, and route machine-level requests | |
| (such as interrupts or IOMMU mappings) back to the QEMU process. | |
| initialization | |
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ | |
| The process initialization sequence will follow the same sequence | |
| followed by QEMU. It will first initialize the backend objects, then | |
| device emulation objects. The JSON descriptions sent by the QEMU process | |
| will drive which objects need to be created. | |
| - address spaces | |
| Before the device objects are created, the initial address spaces and | |
| memory regions must be configured with ``memory_map_init()``. This | |
| creates a RAM memory region object (*system\_memory*) and an IO memory | |
| region object (*system\_io*). | |
| - RAM | |
| RAM memory region creation will follow how ``pc_memory_init()`` creates | |
| them, but must use ``memory_region_init_ram_from_fd()`` instead of | |
| ``memory_region_allocate_system_memory()``. The file descriptors needed | |
| will be supplied by the guest memory table from above. Those RAM regions | |
| would then be added to the *system\_memory* memory region with | |
| ``memory_region_add_subregion()``. | |
| - PCI | |
| IO initialization will be driven by the JSON descriptions sent from the | |
| QEMU process. For a PCI device, a PCI bus will need to be created with | |
| ``pci_root_bus_new()``, and a PCI memory region will need to be created | |
| and added to the *system\_memory* memory region with | |
| ``memory_region_add_subregion_overlap()``. The overlap version is | |
| required for architectures where PCI memory overlaps with RAM memory. | |
| MMIO handling | |
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ | |
| The device emulation objects will use ``memory_region_init_io()`` to | |
| install their MMIO handlers, and ``pci_register_bar()`` to associate | |
| those handlers with a PCI BAR, as they do within QEMU currently. | |
| In order to use ``address_space_rw()`` in the emulation process to | |
| handle MMIO requests from QEMU, the PCI physical addresses must be the | |
| same in the QEMU process and the device emulation process. In order to | |
| accomplish that, guest BAR programming must also be forwarded from QEMU | |
| to the emulation process. | |
| interrupt injection | |
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ | |
| When device emulation wants to inject an interrupt into the VM, the | |
| request climbs the device's bus object hierarchy until the point where a | |
| bus object knows how to signal the interrupt to the guest. The details | |
| depend on the type of interrupt being raised. | |
| - PCI pin interrupts | |
| On x86 systems, there is an emulated IOAPIC object attached to the root | |
| PCI bus object, and the root PCI object forwards interrupt requests to | |
| it. The IOAPIC object, in turn, calls the KVM driver to inject the | |
| corresponding interrupt into the VM. The simplest way to handle this in | |
| an emulation process would be to setup the root PCI bus driver (via | |
| ``pci_bus_irqs()``) to send a interrupt request back to the QEMU | |
| process, and have the device proxy object reflect it up the PCI tree | |
| there. | |
| - PCI MSI/X interrupts | |
| PCI MSI/X interrupts are implemented in HW as DMA writes to a | |
| CPU-specific PCI address. In QEMU on x86, a KVM APIC object receives | |
| these DMA writes, then calls into the KVM driver to inject the interrupt | |
| into the VM. A simple emulation process implementation would be to send | |
| the MSI DMA address from QEMU as a message at initialization, then | |
| install an address space handler at that address which forwards the MSI | |
| message back to QEMU. | |
| DMA operations | |
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ | |
| When a emulation object wants to DMA into or out of guest memory, it | |
| first must use dma\_memory\_map() to convert the DMA address to a local | |
| virtual address. The emulation process memory region objects setup above | |
| will be used to translate the DMA address to a local virtual address the | |
| device emulation code can access. | |
| IOMMU | |
| ^^^^^ | |
| When an IOMMU is in use in QEMU, DMA translation uses IOMMU memory | |
| regions to translate the DMA address to a guest physical address before | |
| that physical address can be translated to a local virtual address. The | |
| emulation process will need similar functionality. | |
| - IOTLB cache | |
| The emulation process will maintain a cache of recent IOMMU translations | |
| (the IOTLB). When the translate() callback of an IOMMU memory region is | |
| invoked, the IOTLB cache will be searched for an entry that will map the | |
| DMA address to a guest PA. On a cache miss, a message will be sent back | |
| to QEMU requesting the corresponding translation entry, which be both be | |
| used to return a guest address and be added to the cache. | |
| - IOTLB purge | |
| The IOMMU emulation will also need to act on unmap requests from QEMU. | |
| These happen when the guest IOMMU driver purges an entry from the | |
| guest's translation table. | |
| live migration | |
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ | |
| When a remote process receives a live migration indication from QEMU, it | |
| will set up a channel using the received file descriptor with | |
| ``qio_channel_socket_new_fd()``. This channel will be used to create a | |
| *QEMUfile* that can be passed to ``qemu_save_device_state()`` to send | |
| the process's device state back to QEMU. This method will be reversed on | |
| restore - the channel will be passed to ``qemu_loadvm_state()`` to | |
| restore the device state. | |
| Accelerating device emulation | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
| The messages that are required to be sent between QEMU and the emulation | |
| process can add considerable latency to IO operations. The optimizations | |
| described below attempt to ameliorate this effect by allowing the | |
| emulation process to communicate directly with the kernel KVM driver. | |
| The KVM file descriptors created would be passed to the emulation process | |
| via initialization messages, much like the guest memory table is done. | |
| #### MMIO acceleration | |
| Vhost user applications can receive guest virtio driver stores directly | |
| from KVM. The issue with the eventfd mechanism used by vhost user is | |
| that it does not pass any data with the event indication, so it cannot | |
| handle guest loads or guest stores that carry store data. This concept | |
| could, however, be expanded to cover more cases. | |
| The expanded idea would require a new type of KVM device: | |
| *KVM\_DEV\_TYPE\_USER*. This device has two file descriptors: a master | |
| descriptor that QEMU can use for configuration, and a slave descriptor | |
| that the emulation process can use to receive MMIO notifications. QEMU | |
| would create both descriptors using the KVM driver, and pass the slave | |
| descriptor to the emulation process via an initialization message. | |
| data structures | |
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ | |
| - guest physical range | |
| The guest physical range structure describes the address range that a | |
| device will respond to. It includes the base and length of the range, as | |
| well as which bus the range resides on (e.g., on an x86machine, it can | |
| specify whether the range refers to memory or IO addresses). | |
| A device can have multiple physical address ranges it responds to (e.g., | |
| a PCI device can have multiple BARs), so the structure will also include | |
| an enumerated identifier to specify which of the device's ranges is | |
| being referred to. | |
| +--------+----------------------------+ | |
| | Name | Description | | |
| +========+============================+ | |
| | addr | range base address | | |
| +--------+----------------------------+ | |
| | len | range length | | |
| +--------+----------------------------+ | |
| | bus | addr type (memory or IO) | | |
| +--------+----------------------------+ | |
| | id | range ID (e.g., PCI BAR) | | |
| +--------+----------------------------+ | |
| - MMIO request structure | |
| This structure describes an MMIO operation. It includes which guest | |
| physical range the MMIO was within, the offset within that range, the | |
| MMIO type (e.g., load or store), and its length and data. It also | |
| includes a sequence number that can be used to reply to the MMIO, and | |
| the CPU that issued the MMIO. | |
| +----------+------------------------+ | |
| | Name | Description | | |
| +==========+========================+ | |
| | rid | range MMIO is within | | |
| +----------+------------------------+ | |
| | offset | offset within *rid* | | |
| +----------+------------------------+ | |
| | type | e.g., load or store | | |
| +----------+------------------------+ | |
| | len | MMIO length | | |
| +----------+------------------------+ | |
| | data | store data | | |
| +----------+------------------------+ | |
| | seq | sequence ID | | |
| +----------+------------------------+ | |
| - MMIO request queues | |
| MMIO request queues are FIFO arrays of MMIO request structures. There | |
| are two queues: pending queue is for MMIOs that haven't been read by the | |
| emulation program, and the sent queue is for MMIOs that haven't been | |
| acknowledged. The main use of the second queue is to validate MMIO | |
| replies from the emulation program. | |
| - scoreboard | |
| Each CPU in the VM is emulated in QEMU by a separate thread, so multiple | |
| MMIOs may be waiting to be consumed by an emulation program and multiple | |
| threads may be waiting for MMIO replies. The scoreboard would contain a | |
| wait queue and sequence number for the per-CPU threads, allowing them to | |
| be individually woken when the MMIO reply is received from the emulation | |
| program. It also tracks the number of posted MMIO stores to the device | |
| that haven't been replied to, in order to satisfy the PCI constraint | |
| that a load to a device will not complete until all previous stores to | |
| that device have been completed. | |
| - device shadow memory | |
| Some MMIO loads do not have device side-effects. These MMIOs can be | |
| completed without sending a MMIO request to the emulation program if the | |
| emulation program shares a shadow image of the device's memory image | |
| with the KVM driver. | |
| The emulation program will ask the KVM driver to allocate memory for the | |
| shadow image, and will then use ``mmap()`` to directly access it. The | |
| emulation program can control KVM access to the shadow image by sending | |
| KVM an access map telling it which areas of the image have no | |
| side-effects (and can be completed immediately), and which require a | |
| MMIO request to the emulation program. The access map can also inform | |
| the KVM drive which size accesses are allowed to the image. | |
| master descriptor | |
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ | |
| The master descriptor is used by QEMU to configure the new KVM device. | |
| The descriptor would be returned by the KVM driver when QEMU issues a | |
| *KVM\_CREATE\_DEVICE* ``ioctl()`` with a *KVM\_DEV\_TYPE\_USER* type. | |
| KVM\_DEV\_TYPE\_USER device ops | |
| The *KVM\_DEV\_TYPE\_USER* operations vector will be registered by a | |
| ``kvm_register_device_ops()`` call when the KVM system in initialized by | |
| ``kvm_init()``. These device ops are called by the KVM driver when QEMU | |
| executes certain ``ioctl()`` operations on its KVM file descriptor. They | |
| include: | |
| - create | |
| This routine is called when QEMU issues a *KVM\_CREATE\_DEVICE* | |
| ``ioctl()`` on its per-VM file descriptor. It will allocate and | |
| initialize a KVM user device specific data structure, and assign the | |
| *kvm\_device* private field to it. | |
| - ioctl | |
| This routine is invoked when QEMU issues an ``ioctl()`` on the master | |
| descriptor. The ``ioctl()`` commands supported are defined by the KVM | |
| device type. *KVM\_DEV\_TYPE\_USER* ones will need several commands: | |
| *KVM\_DEV\_USER\_SLAVE\_FD* creates the slave file descriptor that will | |
| be passed to the device emulation program. Only one slave can be created | |
| by each master descriptor. The file operations performed by this | |
| descriptor are described below. | |
| The *KVM\_DEV\_USER\_PA\_RANGE* command configures a guest physical | |
| address range that the slave descriptor will receive MMIO notifications | |
| for. The range is specified by a guest physical range structure | |
| argument. For buses that assign addresses to devices dynamically, this | |
| command can be executed while the guest is running, such as the case | |
| when a guest changes a device's PCI BAR registers. | |
| *KVM\_DEV\_USER\_PA\_RANGE* will use ``kvm_io_bus_register_dev()`` to | |
| register *kvm\_io\_device\_ops* callbacks to be invoked when the guest | |
| performs a MMIO operation within the range. When a range is changed, | |
| ``kvm_io_bus_unregister_dev()`` is used to remove the previous | |
| instantiation. | |
| *KVM\_DEV\_USER\_TIMEOUT* will configure a timeout value that specifies | |
| how long KVM will wait for the emulation process to respond to a MMIO | |
| indication. | |
| - destroy | |
| This routine is called when the VM instance is destroyed. It will need | |
| to destroy the slave descriptor; and free any memory allocated by the | |
| driver, as well as the *kvm\_device* structure itself. | |
| slave descriptor | |
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ | |
| The slave descriptor will have its own file operations vector, which | |
| responds to system calls on the descriptor performed by the device | |
| emulation program. | |
| - read | |
| A read returns any pending MMIO requests from the KVM driver as MMIO | |
| request structures. Multiple structures can be returned if there are | |
| multiple MMIO operations pending. The MMIO requests are moved from the | |
| pending queue to the sent queue, and if there are threads waiting for | |
| space in the pending to add new MMIO operations, they will be woken | |
| here. | |
| - write | |
| A write also consists of a set of MMIO requests. They are compared to | |
| the MMIO requests in the sent queue. Matches are removed from the sent | |
| queue, and any threads waiting for the reply are woken. If a store is | |
| removed, then the number of posted stores in the per-CPU scoreboard is | |
| decremented. When the number is zero, and a non side-effect load was | |
| waiting for posted stores to complete, the load is continued. | |
| - ioctl | |
| There are several ioctl()s that can be performed on the slave | |
| descriptor. | |
| A *KVM\_DEV\_USER\_SHADOW\_SIZE* ``ioctl()`` causes the KVM driver to | |
| allocate memory for the shadow image. This memory can later be | |
| ``mmap()``\ ed by the emulation process to share the emulation's view of | |
| device memory with the KVM driver. | |
| A *KVM\_DEV\_USER\_SHADOW\_CTRL* ``ioctl()`` controls access to the | |
| shadow image. It will send the KVM driver a shadow control map, which | |
| specifies which areas of the image can complete guest loads without | |
| sending the load request to the emulation program. It will also specify | |
| the size of load operations that are allowed. | |
| - poll | |
| An emulation program will use the ``poll()`` call with a *POLLIN* flag | |
| to determine if there are MMIO requests waiting to be read. It will | |
| return if the pending MMIO request queue is not empty. | |
| - mmap | |
| This call allows the emulation program to directly access the shadow | |
| image allocated by the KVM driver. As device emulation updates device | |
| memory, changes with no side-effects will be reflected in the shadow, | |
| and the KVM driver can satisfy guest loads from the shadow image without | |
| needing to wait for the emulation program. | |
| kvm\_io\_device ops | |
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ | |
| Each KVM per-CPU thread can handle MMIO operation on behalf of the guest | |
| VM. KVM will use the MMIO's guest physical address to search for a | |
| matching *kvm\_io\_device* to see if the MMIO can be handled by the KVM | |
| driver instead of exiting back to QEMU. If a match is found, the | |
| corresponding callback will be invoked. | |
| - read | |
| This callback is invoked when the guest performs a load to the device. | |
| Loads with side-effects must be handled synchronously, with the KVM | |
| driver putting the QEMU thread to sleep waiting for the emulation | |
| process reply before re-starting the guest. Loads that do not have | |
| side-effects may be optimized by satisfying them from the shadow image, | |
| if there are no outstanding stores to the device by this CPU. PCI memory | |
| ordering demands that a load cannot complete before all older stores to | |
| the same device have been completed. | |
| - write | |
| Stores can be handled asynchronously unless the pending MMIO request | |
| queue is full. In this case, the QEMU thread must sleep waiting for | |
| space in the queue. Stores will increment the number of posted stores in | |
| the per-CPU scoreboard, in order to implement the PCI ordering | |
| constraint above. | |
| interrupt acceleration | |
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ | |
| This performance optimization would work much like a vhost user | |
| application does, where the QEMU process sets up *eventfds* that cause | |
| the device's corresponding interrupt to be triggered by the KVM driver. | |
| These irq file descriptors are sent to the emulation process at | |
| initialization, and are used when the emulation code raises a device | |
| interrupt. | |
| intx acceleration | |
| ''''''''''''''''' | |
| Traditional PCI pin interrupts are level based, so, in addition to an | |
| irq file descriptor, a re-sampling file descriptor needs to be sent to | |
| the emulation program. This second file descriptor allows multiple | |
| devices sharing an irq to be notified when the interrupt has been | |
| acknowledged by the guest, so they can re-trigger the interrupt if their | |
| device has not de-asserted its interrupt. | |
| intx irq descriptor | |
| The irq descriptors are created by the proxy object | |
| ``using event_notifier_init()`` to create the irq and re-sampling | |
| *eventds*, and ``kvm_vm_ioctl(KVM_IRQFD)`` to bind them to an interrupt. | |
| The interrupt route can be found with | |
| ``pci_device_route_intx_to_irq()``. | |
| intx routing changes | |
| Intx routing can be changed when the guest programs the APIC the device | |
| pin is connected to. The proxy object in QEMU will use | |
| ``pci_device_set_intx_routing_notifier()`` to be informed of any guest | |
| changes to the route. This handler will broadly follow the VFIO | |
| interrupt logic to change the route: de-assigning the existing irq | |
| descriptor from its route, then assigning it the new route. (see | |
| ``vfio_intx_update()``) | |
| MSI/X acceleration | |
| '''''''''''''''''' | |
| MSI/X interrupts are sent as DMA transactions to the host. The interrupt | |
| data contains a vector that is programmed by the guest, A device may have | |
| multiple MSI interrupts associated with it, so multiple irq descriptors | |
| may need to be sent to the emulation program. | |
| MSI/X irq descriptor | |
| This case will also follow the VFIO example. For each MSI/X interrupt, | |
| an *eventfd* is created, a virtual interrupt is allocated by | |
| ``kvm_irqchip_add_msi_route()``, and the virtual interrupt is bound to | |
| the eventfd with ``kvm_irqchip_add_irqfd_notifier()``. | |
| MSI/X config space changes | |
| The guest may dynamically update several MSI-related tables in the | |
| device's PCI config space. These include per-MSI interrupt enables and | |
| vector data. Additionally, MSIX tables exist in device memory space, not | |
| config space. Much like the BAR case above, the proxy object must look | |
| at guest config space programming to keep the MSI interrupt state | |
| consistent between QEMU and the emulation program. | |
| -------------- | |
| Disaggregated CPU emulation | |
| --------------------------- | |
| After IO services have been disaggregated, a second phase would be to | |
| separate a process to handle CPU instruction emulation from the main | |
| QEMU control function. There are no object separation points for this | |
| code, so the first task would be to create one. | |
| Host access controls | |
| -------------------- | |
| Separating QEMU relies on the host OS's access restriction mechanisms to | |
| enforce that the differing processes can only access the objects they | |
| are entitled to. There are a couple types of mechanisms usually provided | |
| by general purpose OSs. | |
| Discretionary access control | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
| Discretionary access control allows each user to control who can access | |
| their files. In Linux, this type of control is usually too coarse for | |
| QEMU separation, since it only provides three separate access controls: | |
| one for the same user ID, the second for users IDs with the same group | |
| ID, and the third for all other user IDs. Each device instance would | |
| need a separate user ID to provide access control, which is likely to be | |
| unwieldy for dynamically created VMs. | |
| Mandatory access control | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
| Mandatory access control allows the OS to add an additional set of | |
| controls on top of discretionary access for the OS to control. It also | |
| adds other attributes to processes and files such as types, roles, and | |
| categories, and can establish rules for how processes and files can | |
| interact. | |
| Type enforcement | |
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ | |
| Type enforcement assigns a *type* attribute to processes and files, and | |
| allows rules to be written on what operations a process with a given | |
| type can perform on a file with a given type. QEMU separation could take | |
| advantage of type enforcement by running the emulation processes with | |
| different types, both from the main QEMU process, and from the emulation | |
| processes of different classes of devices. | |
| For example, guest disk images and disk emulation processes could have | |
| types separate from the main QEMU process and non-disk emulation | |
| processes, and the type rules could prevent processes other than disk | |
| emulation ones from accessing guest disk images. Similarly, network | |
| emulation processes can have a type separate from the main QEMU process | |
| and non-network emulation process, and only that type can access the | |
| host tun/tap device used to provide guest networking. | |
| Category enforcement | |
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ | |
| Category enforcement assigns a set of numbers within a given range to | |
| the process or file. The process is granted access to the file if the | |
| process's set is a superset of the file's set. This enforcement can be | |
| used to separate multiple instances of devices in the same class. | |
| For example, if there are multiple disk devices provides to a guest, | |
| each device emulation process could be provisioned with a separate | |
| category. The different device emulation processes would not be able to | |
| access each other's backing disk images. | |
| Alternatively, categories could be used in lieu of the type enforcement | |
| scheme described above. In this scenario, different categories would be | |
| used to prevent device emulation processes in different classes from | |
| accessing resources assigned to other classes. |