| /* |
| * Block node graph modifications tests |
| * |
| * Copyright (c) 2019 Virtuozzo International GmbH. All rights reserved. |
| * |
| * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify |
| * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by |
| * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or |
| * (at your option) any later version. |
| * |
| * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, |
| * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of |
| * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the |
| * GNU General Public License for more details. |
| * |
| * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License |
| * along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. |
| * |
| */ |
| |
| #include "qemu/osdep.h" |
| #include "qapi/error.h" |
| #include "block/block_int.h" |
| #include "sysemu/block-backend.h" |
| |
| static BlockDriver bdrv_pass_through = { |
| .format_name = "pass-through", |
| .bdrv_child_perm = bdrv_filter_default_perms, |
| }; |
| |
| static void no_perm_default_perms(BlockDriverState *bs, BdrvChild *c, |
| const BdrvChildRole *role, |
| BlockReopenQueue *reopen_queue, |
| uint64_t perm, uint64_t shared, |
| uint64_t *nperm, uint64_t *nshared) |
| { |
| *nperm = 0; |
| *nshared = BLK_PERM_ALL; |
| } |
| |
| static BlockDriver bdrv_no_perm = { |
| .format_name = "no-perm", |
| .bdrv_child_perm = no_perm_default_perms, |
| }; |
| |
| static BlockDriverState *no_perm_node(const char *name) |
| { |
| return bdrv_new_open_driver(&bdrv_no_perm, name, BDRV_O_RDWR, &error_abort); |
| } |
| |
| static BlockDriverState *pass_through_node(const char *name) |
| { |
| return bdrv_new_open_driver(&bdrv_pass_through, name, |
| BDRV_O_RDWR, &error_abort); |
| } |
| |
| /* |
| * test_update_perm_tree |
| * |
| * When checking node for a possibility to update permissions, it's subtree |
| * should be correctly checked too. New permissions for each node should be |
| * calculated and checked in context of permissions of other nodes. If we |
| * check new permissions of the node only in context of old permissions of |
| * its neighbors, we can finish up with wrong permission graph. |
| * |
| * This test firstly create the following graph: |
| * +--------+ |
| * | root | |
| * +--------+ |
| * | |
| * | perm: write, read |
| * | shared: except write |
| * v |
| * +-------------------+ +----------------+ |
| * | passtrough filter |---------->| null-co node | |
| * +-------------------+ +----------------+ |
| * |
| * |
| * and then, tries to append filter under node. Expected behavior: fail. |
| * Otherwise we'll get the following picture, with two BdrvChild'ren, having |
| * write permission to one node, without actually sharing it. |
| * |
| * +--------+ |
| * | root | |
| * +--------+ |
| * | |
| * | perm: write, read |
| * | shared: except write |
| * v |
| * +-------------------+ |
| * | passtrough filter | |
| * +-------------------+ |
| * | | |
| * perm: write, read | | perm: write, read |
| * shared: except write | | shared: except write |
| * v v |
| * +----------------+ |
| * | null co node | |
| * +----------------+ |
| */ |
| static void test_update_perm_tree(void) |
| { |
| Error *local_err = NULL; |
| |
| BlockBackend *root = blk_new(BLK_PERM_WRITE | BLK_PERM_CONSISTENT_READ, |
| BLK_PERM_ALL & ~BLK_PERM_WRITE); |
| BlockDriverState *bs = no_perm_node("node"); |
| BlockDriverState *filter = pass_through_node("filter"); |
| |
| blk_insert_bs(root, bs, &error_abort); |
| |
| bdrv_attach_child(filter, bs, "child", &child_file, &error_abort); |
| |
| bdrv_append(filter, bs, &local_err); |
| |
| g_assert_nonnull(local_err); |
| error_free(local_err); |
| |
| bdrv_unref(bs); |
| blk_unref(root); |
| } |
| |
| /* |
| * test_should_update_child |
| * |
| * Test that bdrv_replace_node, and concretely should_update_child |
| * do the right thing, i.e. not creating loops on the graph. |
| * |
| * The test does the following: |
| * 1. initial graph: |
| * |
| * +------+ +--------+ |
| * | root | | filter | |
| * +------+ +--------+ |
| * | | |
| * root| target| |
| * v v |
| * +------+ +--------+ |
| * | node |<---------| target | |
| * +------+ backing +--------+ |
| * |
| * 2. Append @filter above @node. If should_update_child works correctly, |
| * it understands, that backing child of @target should not be updated, |
| * as it will create a loop on node graph. Resulting picture should |
| * be the left one, not the right: |
| * |
| * +------+ +------+ |
| * | root | | root | |
| * +------+ +------+ |
| * | | |
| * root| root| |
| * v v |
| * +--------+ target +--------+ target |
| * | filter |--------------+ | filter |--------------+ |
| * +--------+ | +--------+ | |
| * | | | ^ v |
| * backing| | backing| | +--------+ |
| * v v | +-----------| target | |
| * +------+ +--------+ v backing +--------+ |
| * | node |<---------| target | +------+ |
| * +------+ backing +--------+ | node | |
| * +------+ |
| * |
| * (good picture) (bad picture) |
| * |
| */ |
| static void test_should_update_child(void) |
| { |
| BlockBackend *root = blk_new(0, BLK_PERM_ALL); |
| BlockDriverState *bs = no_perm_node("node"); |
| BlockDriverState *filter = no_perm_node("filter"); |
| BlockDriverState *target = no_perm_node("target"); |
| |
| blk_insert_bs(root, bs, &error_abort); |
| |
| bdrv_set_backing_hd(target, bs, &error_abort); |
| |
| g_assert(target->backing->bs == bs); |
| bdrv_attach_child(filter, target, "target", &child_file, &error_abort); |
| bdrv_append(filter, bs, &error_abort); |
| g_assert(target->backing->bs == bs); |
| |
| bdrv_unref(bs); |
| blk_unref(root); |
| } |
| |
| int main(int argc, char *argv[]) |
| { |
| bdrv_init(); |
| qemu_init_main_loop(&error_abort); |
| |
| g_test_init(&argc, &argv, NULL); |
| |
| g_test_add_func("/bdrv-graph-mod/update-perm-tree", test_update_perm_tree); |
| g_test_add_func("/bdrv-graph-mod/should-update-child", |
| test_should_update_child); |
| |
| return g_test_run(); |
| } |