| # For now, we require the base to be a struct without variants | |
| # TODO: It would be possible to allow a union as a base, as long as all | |
| # permutations of QMP names exposed by base do not clash with any QMP | |
| # member names added by local variants. | |
| { 'enum': 'TestEnum', | |
| 'data': [ 'value1', 'value2' ] } | |
| { 'struct': 'TestTypeA', | |
| 'data': { 'string': 'str' } } | |
| { 'struct': 'TestTypeB', | |
| 'data': { 'integer': 'int' } } | |
| { 'enum': 'Enum', 'data': [ 'kind1', 'kind2' ] } | |
| { 'union': 'UnionBase', | |
| 'base': { 'type': 'Enum' }, | |
| 'discriminator': 'type', | |
| 'data': { 'kind1': 'TestTypeA', | |
| 'kind2': 'TestTypeB' } } | |
| { 'union': 'TestUnion', | |
| 'base': 'UnionBase', | |
| 'discriminator': 'type', | |
| 'data': { 'kind1': 'TestTypeA', | |
| 'kind2': 'TestTypeB' } } |