|  | Backwards compatibility | 
|  | ======================= | 
|  |  | 
|  | How backwards compatibility works | 
|  | --------------------------------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | When we do migration, we have two QEMU processes: the source and the | 
|  | target.  There are two cases, they are the same version or they are | 
|  | different versions.  The easy case is when they are the same version. | 
|  | The difficult one is when they are different versions. | 
|  |  | 
|  | There are two things that are different, but they have very similar | 
|  | names and sometimes get confused: | 
|  |  | 
|  | - QEMU version | 
|  | - machine type version | 
|  |  | 
|  | Let's start with a practical example, we start with: | 
|  |  | 
|  | - qemu-system-x86_64 (v5.2), from now on qemu-5.2. | 
|  | - qemu-system-x86_64 (v5.1), from now on qemu-5.1. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Related to this are the "latest" machine types defined on each of | 
|  | them: | 
|  |  | 
|  | - pc-q35-5.2 (newer one in qemu-5.2) from now on pc-5.2 | 
|  | - pc-q35-5.1 (newer one in qemu-5.1) from now on pc-5.1 | 
|  |  | 
|  | First of all, migration is only supposed to work if you use the same | 
|  | machine type in both source and destination. The QEMU hardware | 
|  | configuration needs to be the same also on source and destination. | 
|  | Most aspects of the backend configuration can be changed at will, | 
|  | except for a few cases where the backend features influence frontend | 
|  | device feature exposure.  But that is not relevant for this section. | 
|  |  | 
|  | I am going to list the number of combinations that we can have.  Let's | 
|  | start with the trivial ones, QEMU is the same on source and | 
|  | destination: | 
|  |  | 
|  | 1 - qemu-5.2 -M pc-5.2  -> migrates to -> qemu-5.2 -M pc-5.2 | 
|  |  | 
|  | This is the latest QEMU with the latest machine type. | 
|  | This have to work, and if it doesn't work it is a bug. | 
|  |  | 
|  | 2 - qemu-5.1 -M pc-5.1  -> migrates to -> qemu-5.1 -M pc-5.1 | 
|  |  | 
|  | Exactly the same case than the previous one, but for 5.1. | 
|  | Nothing to see here either. | 
|  |  | 
|  | This are the easiest ones, we will not talk more about them in this | 
|  | section. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Now we start with the more interesting cases.  Consider the case where | 
|  | we have the same QEMU version in both sides (qemu-5.2) but we are using | 
|  | the latest machine type for that version (pc-5.2) but one of an older | 
|  | QEMU version, in this case pc-5.1. | 
|  |  | 
|  | 3 - qemu-5.2 -M pc-5.1  -> migrates to -> qemu-5.2 -M pc-5.1 | 
|  |  | 
|  | It needs to use the definition of pc-5.1 and the devices as they | 
|  | were configured on 5.1, but this should be easy in the sense that | 
|  | both sides are the same QEMU and both sides have exactly the same | 
|  | idea of what the pc-5.1 machine is. | 
|  |  | 
|  | 4 - qemu-5.1 -M pc-5.2  -> migrates to -> qemu-5.1 -M pc-5.2 | 
|  |  | 
|  | This combination is not possible as the qemu-5.1 doesn't understand | 
|  | pc-5.2 machine type.  So nothing to worry here. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Now it comes the interesting ones, when both QEMU processes are | 
|  | different.  Notice also that the machine type needs to be pc-5.1, | 
|  | because we have the limitation than qemu-5.1 doesn't know pc-5.2.  So | 
|  | the possible cases are: | 
|  |  | 
|  | 5 - qemu-5.2 -M pc-5.1  -> migrates to -> qemu-5.1 -M pc-5.1 | 
|  |  | 
|  | This migration is known as newer to older.  We need to make sure | 
|  | when we are developing 5.2 we need to take care about not to break | 
|  | migration to qemu-5.1.  Notice that we can't make updates to | 
|  | qemu-5.1 to understand whatever qemu-5.2 decides to change, so it is | 
|  | in qemu-5.2 side to make the relevant changes. | 
|  |  | 
|  | 6 - qemu-5.1 -M pc-5.1  -> migrates to -> qemu-5.2 -M pc-5.1 | 
|  |  | 
|  | This migration is known as older to newer.  We need to make sure | 
|  | than we are able to receive migrations from qemu-5.1. The problem is | 
|  | similar to the previous one. | 
|  |  | 
|  | If qemu-5.1 and qemu-5.2 were the same, there will not be any | 
|  | compatibility problems.  But the reason that we create qemu-5.2 is to | 
|  | get new features, devices, defaults, etc. | 
|  |  | 
|  | If we get a device that has a new feature, or change a default value, | 
|  | we have a problem when we try to migrate between different QEMU | 
|  | versions. | 
|  |  | 
|  | So we need a way to tell qemu-5.2 that when we are using machine type | 
|  | pc-5.1, it needs to **not** use the feature, to be able to migrate to | 
|  | real qemu-5.1. | 
|  |  | 
|  | And the equivalent part when migrating from qemu-5.1 to qemu-5.2. | 
|  | qemu-5.2 has to expect that it is not going to get data for the new | 
|  | feature, because qemu-5.1 doesn't know about it. | 
|  |  | 
|  | How do we tell QEMU about these device feature changes?  In | 
|  | hw/core/machine.c:hw_compat_X_Y arrays. | 
|  |  | 
|  | If we change a default value, we need to put back the old value on | 
|  | that array.  And the device, during initialization needs to look at | 
|  | that array to see what value it needs to get for that feature.  And | 
|  | what are we going to put in that array, the value of a property. | 
|  |  | 
|  | To create a property for a device, we need to use one of the | 
|  | DEFINE_PROP_*() macros. See include/hw/qdev-properties.h to find the | 
|  | macros that exist.  With it, we set the default value for that | 
|  | property, and that is what it is going to get in the latest released | 
|  | version.  But if we want a different value for a previous version, we | 
|  | can change that in the hw_compat_X_Y arrays. | 
|  |  | 
|  | hw_compat_X_Y is an array of registers that have the format: | 
|  |  | 
|  | - name_device | 
|  | - name_property | 
|  | - value | 
|  |  | 
|  | Let's see a practical example. | 
|  |  | 
|  | In qemu-5.2 virtio-blk-device got multi queue support.  This is a | 
|  | change that is not backward compatible.  In qemu-5.1 it has one | 
|  | queue. In qemu-5.2 it has the same number of queues as the number of | 
|  | cpus in the system. | 
|  |  | 
|  | When we are doing migration, if we migrate from a device that has 4 | 
|  | queues to a device that have only one queue, we don't know where to | 
|  | put the extra information for the other 3 queues, and we fail | 
|  | migration. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Similar problem when we migrate from qemu-5.1 that has only one queue | 
|  | to qemu-5.2, we only sent information for one queue, but destination | 
|  | has 4, and we have 3 queues that are not properly initialized and | 
|  | anything can happen. | 
|  |  | 
|  | So, how can we address this problem.  Easy, just convince qemu-5.2 | 
|  | that when it is running pc-5.1, it needs to set the number of queues | 
|  | for virtio-blk-devices to 1. | 
|  |  | 
|  | That way we fix the cases 5 and 6. | 
|  |  | 
|  | 5 - qemu-5.2 -M pc-5.1  -> migrates to -> qemu-5.1 -M pc-5.1 | 
|  |  | 
|  | qemu-5.2 -M pc-5.1 sets number of queues to be 1. | 
|  | qemu-5.1 -M pc-5.1 expects number of queues to be 1. | 
|  |  | 
|  | correct.  migration works. | 
|  |  | 
|  | 6 - qemu-5.1 -M pc-5.1  -> migrates to -> qemu-5.2 -M pc-5.1 | 
|  |  | 
|  | qemu-5.1 -M pc-5.1 sets number of queues to be 1. | 
|  | qemu-5.2 -M pc-5.1 expects number of queues to be 1. | 
|  |  | 
|  | correct.  migration works. | 
|  |  | 
|  | And now the other interesting case, case 3.  In this case we have: | 
|  |  | 
|  | 3 - qemu-5.2 -M pc-5.1  -> migrates to -> qemu-5.2 -M pc-5.1 | 
|  |  | 
|  | Here we have the same QEMU in both sides.  So it doesn't matter a | 
|  | lot if we have set the number of queues to 1 or not, because | 
|  | they are the same. | 
|  |  | 
|  | WRONG! | 
|  |  | 
|  | Think what happens if we do one of this double migrations: | 
|  |  | 
|  | A -> migrates -> B -> migrates -> C | 
|  |  | 
|  | where: | 
|  |  | 
|  | A: qemu-5.1 -M pc-5.1 | 
|  | B: qemu-5.2 -M pc-5.1 | 
|  | C: qemu-5.2 -M pc-5.1 | 
|  |  | 
|  | migration A -> B is case 6, so number of queues needs to be 1. | 
|  |  | 
|  | migration B -> C is case 3, so we don't care.  But actually we | 
|  | care because we haven't started the guest in qemu-5.2, it came | 
|  | migrated from qemu-5.1.  So to be in the safe place, we need to | 
|  | always use number of queues 1 when we are using pc-5.1. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Now, how was this done in reality?  The following commit shows how it | 
|  | was done:: | 
|  |  | 
|  | commit 9445e1e15e66c19e42bea942ba810db28052cd05 | 
|  | Author: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> | 
|  | Date:   Tue Aug 18 15:33:47 2020 +0100 | 
|  |  | 
|  | virtio-blk-pci: default num_queues to -smp N | 
|  |  | 
|  | The relevant parts for migration are:: | 
|  |  | 
|  | @@ -1281,7 +1284,8 @@ static const Property virtio_blk_properties[] = { | 
|  | #endif | 
|  | DEFINE_PROP_BIT("request-merging", VirtIOBlock, conf.request_merging, 0, | 
|  | true), | 
|  | -    DEFINE_PROP_UINT16("num-queues", VirtIOBlock, conf.num_queues, 1), | 
|  | +    DEFINE_PROP_UINT16("num-queues", VirtIOBlock, conf.num_queues, | 
|  | +                       VIRTIO_BLK_AUTO_NUM_QUEUES), | 
|  | DEFINE_PROP_UINT16("queue-size", VirtIOBlock, conf.queue_size, 256), | 
|  |  | 
|  | It changes the default value of num_queues.  But it fishes it for old | 
|  | machine types to have the right value:: | 
|  |  | 
|  | @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ | 
|  | GlobalProperty hw_compat_5_1[] = { | 
|  | ... | 
|  | +    { "virtio-blk-device", "num-queues", "1"}, | 
|  | ... | 
|  | }; | 
|  |  | 
|  | A device with different features on both sides | 
|  | ---------------------------------------------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | Let's assume that we are using the same QEMU binary on both sides, | 
|  | just to make the things easier.  But we have a device that has | 
|  | different features on both sides of the migration.  That can be | 
|  | because the devices are different, because the kernel driver of both | 
|  | devices have different features, whatever. | 
|  |  | 
|  | How can we get this to work with migration.  The way to do that is | 
|  | "theoretically" easy.  You have to get the features that the device | 
|  | has in the source of the migration.  The features that the device has | 
|  | on the target of the migration, you get the intersection of the | 
|  | features of both sides, and that is the way that you should launch | 
|  | QEMU. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Notice that this is not completely related to QEMU.  The most | 
|  | important thing here is that this should be handled by the managing | 
|  | application that launches QEMU.  If QEMU is configured correctly, the | 
|  | migration will succeed. | 
|  |  | 
|  | That said, actually doing it is complicated.  Almost all devices are | 
|  | bad at being able to be launched with only some features enabled. | 
|  | With one big exception: cpus. | 
|  |  | 
|  | You can read the documentation for QEMU x86 cpu models here: | 
|  |  | 
|  | https://qemu-project.gitlab.io/qemu/system/qemu-cpu-models.html | 
|  |  | 
|  | See when they talk about migration they recommend that one chooses the | 
|  | newest cpu model that is supported for all cpus. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Let's say that we have: | 
|  |  | 
|  | Host A: | 
|  |  | 
|  | Device X has the feature Y | 
|  |  | 
|  | Host B: | 
|  |  | 
|  | Device X has not the feature Y | 
|  |  | 
|  | If we try to migrate without any care from host A to host B, it will | 
|  | fail because when migration tries to load the feature Y on | 
|  | destination, it will find that the hardware is not there. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Doing this would be the equivalent of doing with cpus: | 
|  |  | 
|  | Host A: | 
|  |  | 
|  | $ qemu-system-x86_64 -cpu host | 
|  |  | 
|  | Host B: | 
|  |  | 
|  | $ qemu-system-x86_64 -cpu host | 
|  |  | 
|  | When both hosts have different cpu features this is guaranteed to | 
|  | fail.  Especially if Host B has less features than host A.  If host A | 
|  | has less features than host B, sometimes it works.  Important word of | 
|  | last sentence is "sometimes". | 
|  |  | 
|  | So, forgetting about cpu models and continuing with the -cpu host | 
|  | example, let's see that the differences of the cpus is that Host A and | 
|  | B have the following features: | 
|  |  | 
|  | Features:   'pcid'  'stibp' 'taa-no' | 
|  | Host A:        X       X | 
|  | Host B:                        X | 
|  |  | 
|  | And we want to migrate between them, the way configure both QEMU cpu | 
|  | will be: | 
|  |  | 
|  | Host A: | 
|  |  | 
|  | $ qemu-system-x86_64 -cpu host,pcid=off,stibp=off | 
|  |  | 
|  | Host B: | 
|  |  | 
|  | $ qemu-system-x86_64 -cpu host,taa-no=off | 
|  |  | 
|  | And you would be able to migrate between them.  It is responsibility | 
|  | of the management application or of the user to make sure that the | 
|  | configuration is correct.  QEMU doesn't know how to look at this kind | 
|  | of features in general. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Notice that we don't recommend to use -cpu host for migration.  It is | 
|  | used in this example because it makes the example simpler. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Other devices have worse control about individual features.  If they | 
|  | want to be able to migrate between hosts that show different features, | 
|  | the device needs a way to configure which ones it is going to use. | 
|  |  | 
|  | In this section we have considered that we are using the same QEMU | 
|  | binary in both sides of the migration.  If we use different QEMU | 
|  | versions process, then we need to have into account all other | 
|  | differences and the examples become even more complicated. | 
|  |  | 
|  | How to mitigate when we have a backward compatibility error | 
|  | ----------------------------------------------------------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | We broke migration for old machine types continuously during | 
|  | development.  But as soon as we find that there is a problem, we fix | 
|  | it.  The problem is what happens when we detect after we have done a | 
|  | release that something has gone wrong. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Let see how it worked with one example. | 
|  |  | 
|  | After the release of qemu-8.0 we found a problem when doing migration | 
|  | of the machine type pc-7.2. | 
|  |  | 
|  | - $ qemu-7.2 -M pc-7.2  ->  qemu-7.2 -M pc-7.2 | 
|  |  | 
|  | This migration works | 
|  |  | 
|  | - $ qemu-8.0 -M pc-7.2  ->  qemu-8.0 -M pc-7.2 | 
|  |  | 
|  | This migration works | 
|  |  | 
|  | - $ qemu-8.0 -M pc-7.2  ->  qemu-7.2 -M pc-7.2 | 
|  |  | 
|  | This migration fails | 
|  |  | 
|  | - $ qemu-7.2 -M pc-7.2  ->  qemu-8.0 -M pc-7.2 | 
|  |  | 
|  | This migration fails | 
|  |  | 
|  | So clearly something fails when migration between qemu-7.2 and | 
|  | qemu-8.0 with machine type pc-7.2.  The error messages, and git bisect | 
|  | pointed to this commit. | 
|  |  | 
|  | In qemu-8.0 we got this commit:: | 
|  |  | 
|  | commit 010746ae1db7f52700cb2e2c46eb94f299cfa0d2 | 
|  | Author: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> | 
|  | Date:   Thu Mar 2 13:37:02 2023 +0000 | 
|  |  | 
|  | hw/pci/aer: Implement PCI_ERR_UNCOR_MASK register | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  | The relevant bits of the commit for our example are this ones:: | 
|  |  | 
|  | --- a/hw/pci/pcie_aer.c | 
|  | +++ b/hw/pci/pcie_aer.c | 
|  | @@ -112,6 +112,10 @@ int pcie_aer_init(PCIDevice *dev, | 
|  |  | 
|  | pci_set_long(dev->w1cmask + offset + PCI_ERR_UNCOR_STATUS, | 
|  | PCI_ERR_UNC_SUPPORTED); | 
|  | +    pci_set_long(dev->config + offset + PCI_ERR_UNCOR_MASK, | 
|  | +                 PCI_ERR_UNC_MASK_DEFAULT); | 
|  | +    pci_set_long(dev->wmask + offset + PCI_ERR_UNCOR_MASK, | 
|  | +                 PCI_ERR_UNC_SUPPORTED); | 
|  |  | 
|  | pci_set_long(dev->config + offset + PCI_ERR_UNCOR_SEVER, | 
|  | PCI_ERR_UNC_SEVERITY_DEFAULT); | 
|  |  | 
|  | The patch changes how we configure PCI space for AER.  But QEMU fails | 
|  | when the PCI space configuration is different between source and | 
|  | destination. | 
|  |  | 
|  | The following commit shows how this got fixed:: | 
|  |  | 
|  | commit 5ed3dabe57dd9f4c007404345e5f5bf0e347317f | 
|  | Author: Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com> | 
|  | Date:   Tue May 2 21:27:02 2023 -0300 | 
|  |  | 
|  | hw/pci: Disable PCI_ERR_UNCOR_MASK register for machine type < 8.0 | 
|  |  | 
|  | [...] | 
|  |  | 
|  | The relevant parts of the fix in QEMU are as follow: | 
|  |  | 
|  | First, we create a new property for the device to be able to configure | 
|  | the old behaviour or the new behaviour:: | 
|  |  | 
|  | diff --git a/hw/pci/pci.c b/hw/pci/pci.c | 
|  | index 8a87ccc8b0..5153ad63d6 100644 | 
|  | --- a/hw/pci/pci.c | 
|  | +++ b/hw/pci/pci.c | 
|  | @@ -79,6 +79,8 @@ static const Property pci_props[] = { | 
|  | DEFINE_PROP_STRING("failover_pair_id", PCIDevice, | 
|  | failover_pair_id), | 
|  | DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("acpi-index",  PCIDevice, acpi_index, 0), | 
|  | +    DEFINE_PROP_BIT("x-pcie-err-unc-mask", PCIDevice, cap_present, | 
|  | +                    QEMU_PCIE_ERR_UNC_MASK_BITNR, true), | 
|  | }; | 
|  |  | 
|  | Notice that we enable the feature for new machine types. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Now we see how the fix is done.  This is going to depend on what kind | 
|  | of breakage happens, but in this case it is quite simple:: | 
|  |  | 
|  | diff --git a/hw/pci/pcie_aer.c b/hw/pci/pcie_aer.c | 
|  | index 103667c368..374d593ead 100644 | 
|  | --- a/hw/pci/pcie_aer.c | 
|  | +++ b/hw/pci/pcie_aer.c | 
|  | @@ -112,10 +112,13 @@ int pcie_aer_init(PCIDevice *dev, uint8_t cap_ver, | 
|  | uint16_t offset, | 
|  |  | 
|  | pci_set_long(dev->w1cmask + offset + PCI_ERR_UNCOR_STATUS, | 
|  | PCI_ERR_UNC_SUPPORTED); | 
|  | -    pci_set_long(dev->config + offset + PCI_ERR_UNCOR_MASK, | 
|  | -                 PCI_ERR_UNC_MASK_DEFAULT); | 
|  | -    pci_set_long(dev->wmask + offset + PCI_ERR_UNCOR_MASK, | 
|  | -                 PCI_ERR_UNC_SUPPORTED); | 
|  | + | 
|  | +    if (dev->cap_present & QEMU_PCIE_ERR_UNC_MASK) { | 
|  | +        pci_set_long(dev->config + offset + PCI_ERR_UNCOR_MASK, | 
|  | +                     PCI_ERR_UNC_MASK_DEFAULT); | 
|  | +        pci_set_long(dev->wmask + offset + PCI_ERR_UNCOR_MASK, | 
|  | +                     PCI_ERR_UNC_SUPPORTED); | 
|  | +    } | 
|  |  | 
|  | pci_set_long(dev->config + offset + PCI_ERR_UNCOR_SEVER, | 
|  | PCI_ERR_UNC_SEVERITY_DEFAULT); | 
|  |  | 
|  | I.e. If the property bit is enabled, we configure it as we did for | 
|  | qemu-8.0.  If the property bit is not set, we configure it as it was in 7.2. | 
|  |  | 
|  | And now, everything that is missing is disabling the feature for old | 
|  | machine types:: | 
|  |  | 
|  | diff --git a/hw/core/machine.c b/hw/core/machine.c | 
|  | index 47a34841a5..07f763eb2e 100644 | 
|  | --- a/hw/core/machine.c | 
|  | +++ b/hw/core/machine.c | 
|  | @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ GlobalProperty hw_compat_7_2[] = { | 
|  | { "e1000e", "migrate-timadj", "off" }, | 
|  | { "virtio-mem", "x-early-migration", "false" }, | 
|  | { "migration", "x-preempt-pre-7-2", "true" }, | 
|  | +    { TYPE_PCI_DEVICE, "x-pcie-err-unc-mask", "off" }, | 
|  | }; | 
|  | const size_t hw_compat_7_2_len = G_N_ELEMENTS(hw_compat_7_2); | 
|  |  | 
|  | And now, when qemu-8.0.1 is released with this fix, all combinations | 
|  | are going to work as supposed. | 
|  |  | 
|  | - $ qemu-7.2 -M pc-7.2  ->  qemu-7.2 -M pc-7.2 (works) | 
|  | - $ qemu-8.0.1 -M pc-7.2  ->  qemu-8.0.1 -M pc-7.2 (works) | 
|  | - $ qemu-8.0.1 -M pc-7.2  ->  qemu-7.2 -M pc-7.2 (works) | 
|  | - $ qemu-7.2 -M pc-7.2  ->  qemu-8.0.1 -M pc-7.2 (works) | 
|  |  | 
|  | So the normality has been restored and everything is ok, no? | 
|  |  | 
|  | Not really, now our matrix is much bigger.  We started with the easy | 
|  | cases, migration from the same version to the same version always | 
|  | works: | 
|  |  | 
|  | - $ qemu-7.2 -M pc-7.2  ->  qemu-7.2 -M pc-7.2 | 
|  | - $ qemu-8.0 -M pc-7.2  ->  qemu-8.0 -M pc-7.2 | 
|  | - $ qemu-8.0.1 -M pc-7.2  ->  qemu-8.0.1 -M pc-7.2 | 
|  |  | 
|  | Now the interesting ones.  When the QEMU processes versions are | 
|  | different.  For the 1st set, their fail and we can do nothing, both | 
|  | versions are released and we can't change anything. | 
|  |  | 
|  | - $ qemu-7.2 -M pc-7.2  ->  qemu-8.0 -M pc-7.2 | 
|  | - $ qemu-8.0 -M pc-7.2  ->  qemu-7.2 -M pc-7.2 | 
|  |  | 
|  | This two are the ones that work. The whole point of making the | 
|  | change in qemu-8.0.1 release was to fix this issue: | 
|  |  | 
|  | - $ qemu-7.2 -M pc-7.2  ->  qemu-8.0.1 -M pc-7.2 | 
|  | - $ qemu-8.0.1 -M pc-7.2  ->  qemu-7.2 -M pc-7.2 | 
|  |  | 
|  | But now we found that qemu-8.0 neither can migrate to qemu-7.2 not | 
|  | qemu-8.0.1. | 
|  |  | 
|  | - $ qemu-8.0 -M pc-7.2  ->  qemu-8.0.1 -M pc-7.2 | 
|  | - $ qemu-8.0.1 -M pc-7.2  ->  qemu-8.0 -M pc-7.2 | 
|  |  | 
|  | So, if we start a pc-7.2 machine in qemu-8.0 we can't migrate it to | 
|  | anything except to qemu-8.0. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Can we do better? | 
|  |  | 
|  | Yeap.  If we know that we are going to do this migration: | 
|  |  | 
|  | - $ qemu-8.0 -M pc-7.2  ->  qemu-8.0.1 -M pc-7.2 | 
|  |  | 
|  | We can launch the appropriate devices with:: | 
|  |  | 
|  | --device...,x-pci-e-err-unc-mask=on | 
|  |  | 
|  | And now we can receive a migration from 8.0.  And from now on, we can | 
|  | do that migration to new machine types if we remember to enable that | 
|  | property for pc-7.2.  Notice that we need to remember, it is not | 
|  | enough to know that the source of the migration is qemu-8.0.  Think of | 
|  | this example: | 
|  |  | 
|  | $ qemu-8.0 -M pc-7.2 -> qemu-8.0.1 -M pc-7.2 -> qemu-8.2 -M pc-7.2 | 
|  |  | 
|  | In the second migration, the source is not qemu-8.0, but we still have | 
|  | that "problem" and have that property enabled.  Notice that we need to | 
|  | continue having this mark/property until we have this machine | 
|  | rebooted.  But it is not a normal reboot (that don't reload QEMU) we | 
|  | need the machine to poweroff/poweron on a fixed QEMU.  And from now | 
|  | on we can use the proper real machine. |