tree 1e1cafd380c9f8b359757175ab09bfa591cde4eb
parent 6c1e3906ce0bb414478d9c2c698bcbb6d2d28c63
author Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru> 1684155999 +0300
committer Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com> 1684428051 +0200

migration: split migration_incoming_co

Originally, migration_incoming_co was introduced by
25d0c16f625feb3b6
   "migration: Switch to COLO process after finishing loadvm"
to be able to enter from COLO code to one specific yield point, added
by 25d0c16f625feb3b6.

Later in 923709896b1b0
 "migration: poll the cm event for destination qemu"
we reused this variable to wake the migration incoming coroutine from
RDMA code.

That was doubtful idea. Entering coroutines is a very fragile thing:
you should be absolutely sure which yield point you are going to enter.

I don't know how much is it safe to enter during qemu_loadvm_state()
which I think what RDMA want to do. But for sure RDMA shouldn't enter
the special COLO-related yield-point. As well, COLO code doesn't want
to enter during qemu_loadvm_state(), it want to enter it's own specific
yield-point.

As well, when in 8e48ac95865ac97d
 "COLO: Add block replication into colo process" we added
bdrv_invalidate_cache_all() call (now it's called activate_all())
it became possible to enter the migration incoming coroutine during
that call which is wrong too.

So, let't make these things separate and disjoint: loadvm_co for RDMA,
non-NULL during qemu_loadvm_state(), and colo_incoming_co for COLO,
non-NULL only around specific yield.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230515130640.46035-3-vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>