Replace "iothread lock" with "BQL" in comments
The term "iothread lock" is obsolete. The APIs use Big QEMU Lock (BQL)
in their names. Update the code comments to use "BQL" instead of
"iothread lock".
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Durrant <paul@xen.org>
Reviewed-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com>
Message-id: 20240102153529.486531-5-stefanha@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
diff --git a/util/rcu.c b/util/rcu.c
index bb7f633..fa32c94 100644
--- a/util/rcu.c
+++ b/util/rcu.c
@@ -409,7 +409,7 @@
qemu_event_init(&rcu_call_ready_event, false);
- /* The caller is assumed to have iothread lock, so the call_rcu thread
+ /* The caller is assumed to have BQL, so the call_rcu thread
* must have been quiescent even after forking, just recreate it.
*/
qemu_thread_create(&thread, "call_rcu", call_rcu_thread,
