virtio: guard against negative vq notifies
The virtio_queue_notify() function checks that the virtqueue number is
less than the maximum number of virtqueues. A signed comparison is used
but the virtqueue number could be negative if a buggy or malicious guest
is run. This results in memory accesses outside of the virtqueue array.
It is risky doing input validation in common code instead of at the
guest<->host boundary. Note that virtio_queue_set_addr(),
virtio_queue_get_addr(), virtio_queue_get_num(), and many other virtio
functions do *not* validate the virtqueue number argument.
Instead of fixing the comparison in virtio_queue_notify(), move the
comparison to the virtio bindings (just like VIRTIO_PCI_QUEUE_SEL) where
we have a uint32_t value and can avoid ever calling into common virtio
code if the virtqueue number is invalid.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
diff --git a/hw/virtio-pci.c b/hw/virtio-pci.c
index 270e2c7..b86c441 100644
--- a/hw/virtio-pci.c
+++ b/hw/virtio-pci.c
@@ -348,7 +348,9 @@
vdev->queue_sel = val;
break;
case VIRTIO_PCI_QUEUE_NOTIFY:
- virtio_queue_notify(vdev, val);
+ if (val < VIRTIO_PCI_QUEUE_MAX) {
+ virtio_queue_notify(vdev, val);
+ }
break;
case VIRTIO_PCI_STATUS:
if (!(val & VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK)) {