KVM: Don't assume that mpstate exists with in-kernel PIC always
On PPC, we don't support MP state. So far it's not necessary and I'm
not convinced yet that we really need to support it ever.
However, the current idle logic in QEMU assumes that an in-kernel PIC
also means we support MP state. This assumption is not true anymore.
Let's split up the two cases into two different variables. That way
PPC can expose an in-kernel PIC, while not implementing MP state.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
CC: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
diff --git a/include/sysemu/kvm.h b/include/sysemu/kvm.h
index fe8bc40..24c8e95 100644
--- a/include/sysemu/kvm.h
+++ b/include/sysemu/kvm.h
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
extern bool kvm_allowed;
extern bool kvm_kernel_irqchip;
extern bool kvm_async_interrupts_allowed;
+extern bool kvm_halt_in_kernel_allowed;
extern bool kvm_irqfds_allowed;
extern bool kvm_msi_via_irqfd_allowed;
extern bool kvm_gsi_routing_allowed;
@@ -73,6 +74,14 @@
#define kvm_async_interrupts_enabled() (kvm_async_interrupts_allowed)
/**
+ * kvm_halt_in_kernel
+ *
+ * Returns: true if halted cpus should still get a KVM_RUN ioctl to run
+ * inside of kernel space. This only works if MP state is implemented.
+ */
+#define kvm_halt_in_kernel() (kvm_halt_in_kernel_allowed)
+
+/**
* kvm_irqfds_enabled:
*
* Returns: true if we can use irqfds to inject interrupts into
@@ -110,6 +119,7 @@
#define kvm_enabled() (0)
#define kvm_irqchip_in_kernel() (false)
#define kvm_async_interrupts_enabled() (false)
+#define kvm_halt_in_kernel() (false)
#define kvm_irqfds_enabled() (false)
#define kvm_msi_via_irqfd_enabled() (false)
#define kvm_gsi_routing_allowed() (false)