COLO-compare: Fix incorrect `if` logic
'colo_mark_tcp_pkt' should return 'true' when packets are the same, and
'false' otherwise. However, it returns 'true' when
'colo_compare_packet_payload' returns non-zero while
'colo_compare_packet_payload' is just a 'memcmp'. The result is that
COLO-compare reports inconsistent TCP packets when they are actually
the same.
Fixes: f449c9e549c ("colo: compare the packet based on the tcp sequence number")
Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Fan Yang <Fan_Yang@sjtu.edu.cn>
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
diff --git a/net/colo-compare.c b/net/colo-compare.c
index 7489840..7ee17f2 100644
--- a/net/colo-compare.c
+++ b/net/colo-compare.c
@@ -319,7 +319,7 @@
*mark = 0;
if (ppkt->tcp_seq == spkt->tcp_seq && ppkt->seq_end == spkt->seq_end) {
- if (colo_compare_packet_payload(ppkt, spkt,
+ if (!colo_compare_packet_payload(ppkt, spkt,
ppkt->header_size, spkt->header_size,
ppkt->payload_size)) {
*mark = COLO_COMPARE_FREE_SECONDARY | COLO_COMPARE_FREE_PRIMARY;
@@ -329,7 +329,7 @@
/* one part of secondary packet payload still need to be compared */
if (!after(ppkt->seq_end, spkt->seq_end)) {
- if (colo_compare_packet_payload(ppkt, spkt,
+ if (!colo_compare_packet_payload(ppkt, spkt,
ppkt->header_size + ppkt->offset,
spkt->header_size + spkt->offset,
ppkt->payload_size - ppkt->offset)) {
@@ -348,7 +348,7 @@
/* primary packet is longer than secondary packet, compare
* the same part and mark the primary packet offset
*/
- if (colo_compare_packet_payload(ppkt, spkt,
+ if (!colo_compare_packet_payload(ppkt, spkt,
ppkt->header_size + ppkt->offset,
spkt->header_size + spkt->offset,
spkt->payload_size - spkt->offset)) {