)]}'
{
  "commit": "6184ca06c8d8df9235aef2b5331f9f11b3aff8be",
  "tree": "d36ffb85d34caf84e00e42621e22092c59a7cc18",
  "parents": [
    "26a65a1e32fb3742e2ce4fd6fd6f03e202624e2b"
  ],
  "author": {
    "name": "Gustavo Romero",
    "email": "gromero@linux.ibm.com",
    "time": "Mon Jun 22 16:48:13 2020 -0400"
  },
  "committer": {
    "name": "Alexey Kardashevskiy",
    "email": "aik@ozlabs.ru",
    "time": "Wed Jun 24 10:30:28 2020 +1000"
  },
  "message": "board-qemu: Fix comment about SLOF start address\n\nOn QEMU pseries (and alike environments) the PC starts at 0x100, hence SLOF\nstarts at address 0x100, not at 0x0 as the current comment informs. After\nthat fix the comment also matches the comment above it about the __start\nload position, which is correct.\n\nSigned-off-by: Gustavo Romero \u003cgromero@linux.ibm.com\u003e\nSigned-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy \u003caik@ozlabs.ru\u003e\n",
  "tree_diff": [
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "bbd3ce3ac51bf7f6fabbbe0de76dab8915bd536f",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "board-qemu/llfw/startup.S",
      "new_id": "96cbb3e76e06e128221ebdd4d3a7d9ad537f05e8",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "board-qemu/llfw/startup.S"
    }
  ]
}